• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing”

    How can they say this? What are they basing it on? The article literally just has the quote of

    “We assess that it did not collect while it was flying over the U.S.,” Pentagon spokesman Brigadier General Pat Ryder told reporters.

    How did they assess that?

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We shot it down right? So they probably looked at the hardware. Antenna, processor and other hardware design. Should be pretty easy to reverse engineer it’s capabilities and flight path. At that point you’d know if it was close enough to monitor whatever military base.

      Yeah it’s going to be largely conjectural.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They didn’t just say that it didn’t collect military info though, they said it didn’t collect anything. There’s no way a Chinese spy balloon didn’t collect anything. They have no possible way of knowing what it did and didn’t collect, especially since they destroyed it. All we know is that it absolute did collect data - that’s the reason why it exists in the first place.