• frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s crazy when you think about the whole supply chain: preparing the soil, ploughing, applying fertilisers, applying pesticides, harvesting, processing, transporting, and then you just chuck it out and each step of production had its footprint.

    • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s crazy when you think about the whole supply chain: preparing the soil, ploughing, applying fertilisers, applying pesticides, harvesting, processing, transporting

      It’s also crazy how efficient modern agriculture must be to do all these things and get affordable products in the end

      • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        efficiency ≠ price

        you’ve glossed over a lot of economics. Like, for one thing, the EU gives about €55 billion in agricultural subsidies a year.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Cost of production puts a lower bound on the price. In case of competitive industries, price floats just above that limit

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      NPR/USDA estimate that adults eat about 2000 pounds of food per year, so 94kg/2000 pounds = 10%. 73 kg/2000 pounds = 8%. Not bad, honestly, considering, for example, a banana peel is 12% of the banana.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So if they’ve shown percentage the numbers wouldn’t really fit the agenda. Biased article is biased