• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Mint, judge me

    PS anyone have any favorite resources for absolute tech illiterate noobs? I’m trying, but without a baseline understanding of the subject, it’s hard to find the right guides

  • Skyline969@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Linux Mint. Cinnamon. With a Windows Vista theme. It confuses and/or irritates everyone who sees it.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Ooookay, this will get controversial.

    Proud Manjaro/Debian user!

    • Ubuntu and derivatives suck because of Canonical and their practices
    • Fedora sucks because of Red Hat
    • OpenSUSE sucks because RPM (why?!) and still SUSE (but they’re the best of the three)
    • Rest is exotic and obscure

    So we end up with Arch and Debian. Debian 12 is good enough as is, and runs on a work laptop where I don’t care about anything but stability. Arch is respectable and great, but requires excessive maintenance to work properly. Among its derivatives, Endeavour is just a nicer archinstall (so, why?), Garuda is cool but unstable and too gamer’y, Manjaro is a bit problematic at times but generally the safest bet when it comes to Arch. So, when it comes to my main PC doubling as a gaming rig, this is a no-brainer.

  • meliante@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Fedora Workstation 40.

    On windows until last year, after trying 11 on my T440s which made it unbearably slow so had to start over but instead of going back to 10 tried a bunch of distros.

    Fedora stuck, mainly because of gnome vanilla (I really like the paradigm, don’t care about deep personalisation) and how everything just worked great.

    Fight me?

    • twei@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah, Fedora is a valid choice, just like Ubuntu is. Both are great if you don’t care that much about personalization and just want a solid distro to get work done.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fedora is pretty much the new Ubuntu more or less. Ubuntu has gone so far downhill that I can’t recommend it to anyone and that’s been the case for quite a while.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s wonderful how the expression “humble Arch Linux user” manages to pack a contradiction in a mere 4 words.

  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I have zorin and mint dual booting on my surface book.

    really liking zorin, very pleasing to look at, simple, haven’t run into any software I had on windows that I can’t run here. I don’t game on, could still be a slight negative, but so far I love it.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been rolling Debian more and more this year. If you’ve got solid Linux chops, it’s really great.

      I also really like LMDE, it’s what I run on my Business laptop.

  • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nobara! switched 2 days ago, deleted my Windows partition 3 hours ago because it’s smooth sailing and quite the different experience compared to bashing my head against debian jessie ages ago.

    Edit: the final nail in the coffin were the fking backported ads in the start menu. seriously, wtf.

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Find me a distro, that works with Nvidia 4070 / Intel CPU.

    Can support a 3 monitor setup with weird sizes. 4k, 1440( in vertical), and a 1600-1200.

    Play most games with out scaling issues.

    That should do

    P.s. very little CLI and tinkering needed.

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, I use SteamOS on my steamdeck. Aside from my nuc which is running ProxMox with several Debian based VMs, that’s sadly currently the only thing that’s running Linux in my house.

  • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’ve been on mint for a while. Here’s a tip for anyone who needs some windows apps that won’t work in Linux.

    VM workstation 17 is free and is fast as balls. With plug and play pass through too.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why would you want that on Linux? We already have qemu KVM which can be used via libvirt. Just install virtual manager and be done with it.

      The speed you are seeing is the same as KVM

      • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why would you want that on Linux? We already have qemu KVM which can be used via libvirt. Just install virtual manager and be done with it.

        Slow down. VMware can be one click and done. All these alternatives and extras and configurations are the reason windows people don’t try Linux. Don’t over complicate a simple thing. If they want new or more they can figure that out at a later date.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          VMware is much harder to setup as it requires additional setup

          You just install virt-manager and reboot. That’s it.

          sudo apt install virt-manager
          
            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Exactly. That’s way more complicated and requires loading external software not packaged by distros. Meanwhile virt manager is very easy to install and it is in the repos pretty much everywhere. You also could use gnome boxes as it doesn’t even need root. It is just a flatpak

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Reactions:

    Ubuntu: 😮why?

    Manjaro: haven’t you managed to kill it yet?

    Mint: ex windows guy?

    Debian: 😃nice, how did you got to that decision?

    Endeavour: 😃nice, how did you got to that decision?

    Arch: 😃nice, how did you got to that decision?

    Nix: 😃nice, how did you got to that decision?

    OpenSUSE: 😃nice, how did you got to that decision?

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Lol, forgot that very important one 😂

        Reaction: 😃good choice! I think it is a good well distro for people coming to linux✌🏻

    • janAkali@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ubuntu: 😮why?

      For a lot of people Ubuntu is the linux. Canonical is just good at marketing. For all it worth, Ubuntu is not the bad choice for average user who’s not into ricing and not bothered by bloat.

      Manjaro: haven’t you managed to kill it yet?

      I’ve been using Arch and Manjaro for couple years each and in my experience they both break regularly. But, for some weird reason, Arch Linux is praised, when Manjaro is shamed upon.

      Mint: ex windows guy?

      Aren’t we all?

      • Ooops@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’ve been using Arch and Manjaro for couple years each and in my experience they both break regularly. But, for some weird reason, Arch Linux is praised, when Manjaro is shamed upon.

        No, there is not some weird reason but actual very good ones.

        Things can break on a bleeding edge update scheme. That’s to be expected from time to time. But the questions are “why did it break” and “what is done to fix it”.

        If something breaks on Archlinux it’s because of some new package with a issue that escaped testing. Then the fix come out as fast as possible (often within minutes even, but let’s assume hours as those things need to move through mirrors first…).

        If something breaks on Manjaro it’s either because of the exact same reason as above, but 2 weeks later. Because Manjaro keeps back updates for two weeks “for stability reasons”, yet doesn’t do anything in those 2 weeks. So they just add the same problem later, completely defeating the argumant about stability. Oh, and fixes are of course kept back for 2 weeks, too, because… reasons.

        Or it breaks because they fucked up their internal QA. For example by letting their certificates expire again and again and again and again… of by screwing up their very own pacman-wrapper and then ddos’ing the AUR for all users, not only Manjaro ones.

        Or -speaking about the AUR- it breaks because they give their users full access to the Arch User Repository (without any warnings about user content being less reliable and used at your own risk) pre-installed. Also they do it on a system generally out-of-date because it lags 2 weeks behind. Which is not what AUR packages are build for (they assume up-to-date systems) and is a straight path to dependency hell and breakings… not because something went wrong but because the whole concept of an out-of-date system not running their own also 2-weeks behind version onf the AUR is idiotic. On the “plus” side they have an easy fix: blame the user, because he should obviously know that an pre-installed part of Manjaro is conceptionally flawed and shouldn’t be trusted.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Exactly that, AUR is mostly unusable in manjaro and manjaro is mostly unusable if you don’t have AUR packages, in my opinion.

      • waz@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Linux mint: ex windows guy? I take offence, I’m an ex-SuSE 4.2, ex-macOS, windows only at work guy. (My cinnamon is themed to have macOS ish appearance btw.) [and I lied, not ex-mac as such, I have a few macs round the house, and built my Linux machine to run games on steam/lutris, around a spare gfx card that came out of my classic Mac pro5,1]

      • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The main problem with Manjaro is they hold updates to the repos back for to weeks, which in itself isn’t a problem but they don’t do the same for the AUR, meaning you’re almost guaranteed to have dependencie issues at some point. And a, very minor, issue is that in the past they have broken their forum site, but that hasn’t happened for a while now.

    • Disorder6069@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ubuntu: was the first distro that came up… hated it and went back to windows Manjaro: tried it after Ubuntu, was great for 2 months until it broke and I swapped to arch Mint: never used it Debian: used it once for a VM because it wasn’t canonical, but it was meh Endeavour: never used it Arch: it was great and I still use it for my cheap side laptop, but I forgot to update it for a month and it broke on my main laptop and I wasn’t good enough with Linux to fix it at the time so that computer runs Nix Nix: used it after arch broke and I was paranoid with having to fix stuff… still use it on my primary computer but am frustrated with how hard it is to develop in rust on

      • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        In my experience, nix works exceptionally well with Rust. Python and JavaScript are nastier, especially if the libraries use C extensions.

        • Disorder6069@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think my problem comes from trying to compile for MUSL so I can use the binary in an alpine docker container… I’m working on setting up a docket development environment though, so here’s hoping it works