• forgedchaos@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    May be something related to child resistant packaging. From the CPSC FAQ on the Poison Prevention Packaging ACT “For a package to be child-resistant, at least 85% of tested children must not be able to open the package during the first 5 minutes of the test”.https://www.cpsc.gov/FAQ/PPPA

    • 5oap10116@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists (in reference to why the Yosemite garbage cans are difficult to use)

      • Case@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Worked in Yellowstone.

        The bears are smarter than the majority of tourists.

        Humans, being able to read and having signs posted in multiple languages for them, choose to ignore the various hazards and blunder through them.

        Bears, only rarely, if ever, find themselves in trouble with natural features. And they can’t read the warning signs.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The bad news is your home is gone and your child with it in the massive flameball. The good news is, while we can’t quite say your kid was gifted

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I believe it is indicating that the child lock is only 85% effective.

    How the hell they arrived at that number we may never know, but I’ll bet you it’s buried on page 4,987,253 in clause 6, subsection 8 of European Union Product Safety Report 156.421a. Or something.