Saw a number of free books on Apple Books and was wondering if I could get them on my Kindle. Every single one I tried was DRM-free other than 1984.

  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    You not being able to read 1984 because of DRM isn’t ironic.

    But you not able to read the book, because of DRM, and then invoking some preconceived notion about 1984, to claim irony. About a book you can’t read. That is ironic. And you won’t know just how ironic until you read the book.

    Alanis Morissette eat your heart out.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Having read it a long time ago I was having a hard time figuring out what’s ironic about it, thanks for confirming I’m not forgetting something from the book.

      • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think OP was saying that a book that basically tells you to deny Big Brother, fuck the system, and think for yourself is being protected behind the system, in this case DRM

        That’s just my guess, though. Haven’t honestly read 1984 since college

    • Daniel@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I might be wrong but isn’t a concern about DRM that it locks you into a specific ecosystem, which can spy on you? Sure, it’s not government surveillance, but I think that it’s still ironic.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Government surveillance is only what the zeitgeist has turned 1984 into. It isn’t really the focus of the book. Sure, it’s there, but it isn’t the largest thing. The thing is, it’s much better for the media to tell you that it’s just about government surveillance rather than you actually learning what it’s about, which is really also more what it’s about. Now that’s irony.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Remember that time Amazon just straight-up deleted everybody’s bought-and-paid-for copies of 1984 from their Kindles?

    • Daniel@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, I know. E-Book DRM is super lame, because nearly every version of it has already been cracked. It’s just frustrating.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Fun factoid:

        Not the easiest way(need to register, etc.), but I once cracked DRM on an e-book by using my old sony e-reader’s software combined with adobe digital editions. I think my sony e-reader is too old to work with current DRM, so sony/adobe would allow you to convert it to a DRM free version.

        Not only has DRM been cracked. It’s possible to crack it using official software. Like someone complaining about piracy after chucking a copy of their movie on a torrent site.

        Obviously, there are much easier ways. Or just pirate that shit after you’ve bought it.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Obviously, there are much easier ways. Or just pirate that shit after you’ve bought it.

          I agree with purchasing something to support the creators, which is done mostly to allow them to make more similar stuff. Orwell has been dead for 73 years though. I hope he doesn’t write any more. I don’t know where the money goes for the purchase now, but it’s not supporting the creator anymore.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a good story in my opinion. It’s not exciting and it doesn’t follow common story structure >!the main character just reverts to where he started, for example!<, but it’s worth a read. It’s not particularly long, and it’s still culturally relevant.