I wonder how many moderators may adjust their protest time frame as a result of this comment…

  • ElectricFire@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean he’s not really wrong some subs are already opening back up, without indefinite closure nothings going to really change

    • halo5@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. I think that the whole movement should move to indefinite closure. If anything, it gives us a reason to pop some popcorn!

  • Maeqa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes me wonder what reddit’s usage stats will be in late July or early August once things settle into whatever normal they’re going to be. I can’t imagine they can pull good mod tools out of their asses quickly enough to combat the spam that’ll undoubtedly crop up without automod, etc.

    I think the question is whether this move will ultimately annoy the regular casual lurkers enough. Will it make an impact on reddit’s stats and reputation or not?

    • buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A flood of spam posts hawking cryptocurrency and hot singles in your area might even look on the usage metrics for a while

    • jon@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll probably just plug Automod into OpenAI’s content moderation API or something if too much spam piles up

      • Maeqa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh dear gods, that is the most horrible idea I have heard in my life and yet I somehow fully expect that kind of bullshit.

        • jon@lemmy.tf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          AI content moderation will be chump change if they get enough takers on this new API pricing. Plus they’re wanting to IPO at a time when every Fortune 500 is jumping on the AI bandwagon in quarterly reports, so I’d be surprised if they don’t already have teams researching this internally.

      • halo5@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which tells me he’s probably not that good at his job (which should be maintaining a balance between the two IMO)…

  • zach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, he’s right. They have their work cut out for them though. They’ll need to be on top of things especially regarding moderation, otherwise they will probably continue to bleed users.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They never really had real moderation to begin with, just random volunteers that they gave way too much power to, which is going to be a big problem when they go public. They’ll be under a lot more public and government scrutiny.

      • zach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a good point. Well, they either have a plan or we’re going to witness a top 20 website fail in real time.