• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This sounds like preparations for a blockade of Yemen’s ports. Am I reading this right?

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s probably the most effective way to prevent them from receiving Iranian weapons and shooting them at civilian ships.

      If the Houthis cease their attacks in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, the United States will immediately reevaluate this designation.

      All they gotta do is stop shooting at civilian ships and everyone will go back to not blowing up their assault facilities and preventing weapon shipments.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They have only been getting bombed by the US/UK for a week after attacking civilian shipping since November. Other people might have been bombing them earlier, but the US/UK would be happy to go back to not bombing them if they stop touching the boats.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      While true the US has no business calling anyone else a terrorist, they are NOT facing charges at the Hague. Removed for misinformation.

  • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    So much fucking stereotyping!

    Houthis are a mostly political movement and the de facto government of the most populous parts of Yemen.

    Saying “our action targets the Houthis and not the people of Yemen” is straight nonsense deliberately designed to paint the chosen government of most of the Yemeni people as identical to small groups of terrorists within the large movement.

    It’s straight out of the Dubya/Cheney/Rumsfeld playbook of manufacturing consent for war crimes.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Their slogan shows they’re not as much a political movement but rather a group of religious nuts

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah because slogans always tell the whole story and middle eastern politics never mixes with religion 🙄

        Also, even if it IS a group of religious nuts, does that make ALL of them terrorists?

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          How many ‘normal political movements’ in the middle east have “curse the jewz” in their official emblem?

          Saying “our action targets the Houthis and not the people of Yemen” is straight nonsense deliberately designed to paint the chosen government of most of the Yemeni people as identical to small groups of terrorists within the large movement.

          Do you honestly believe the missile and drone attacks on ships are done by small groups of terrorists without the consent of the Houthi government?