As Donald Trump dominates the GOP nomination race and some of his inflammatory comments find favor with the party faithful, CBS News measured how the public feels about his “poisoning the blood” language. A striking number of voters agree with this description of immigrants who enter the U.S. illegally, and among Republicans, associating the remarks with Trump himself makes them even likelier to agree.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “Most Republicans are literal fucking fascists.”

    I wish I could say I was surprised.

    and among Republicans, associating the remarks with Trump himself makes them even likelier to agree.

    But it’s not a cult. /s

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      10 months ago

      Those people were always there but in a small enough number that they were themselves ashamed to admit it.

      What trump did is he united all those people together into a larger group.

      It is crazy, but before he won primaries in 2016, the GOP was actually opening to accept LGBT, and they believed they would lose without expanding their base. trump show that they didn’t have to.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, hasn’t it grown way beyond the definition of a cult by being like…half of the US? It’s fucked up, sure - but aren’t cults by definition generally “small”?

      This is millions of people. I’m not excusing it, it’s fucked. But I feel like “cult” only serves to place it in a light of “oh this is only a few crazy people”…nah…this is HALF of the USA. You should be gearing up to fight your neighbors if this shit lands. It’s not some silly little group like the word ‘cult’ implies.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, one describes Mussolini as having a cult of personality, but that was still most of 1930s Italy following him. I think cult is still appropriate.

      • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not half of the US population. It’s around 30% of eligible voters (as of 2022). That’s still a huge number of people (74 million), but it’s a lot less than half…

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, it’s only half of the people that actually vote, which turns out to be about 30% overall because 40% of us can’t be bothered to vote at all.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think anyone saying it’s a cult is implying it’s a small group. I’m not sure that’s a fundamental feature of a cult to begin with.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or just not thinking of the implications. “Dilluting the blood” can given multiple interpretations, almost all of which are racist, but some more racist than others.

      A suburban dad who lives across the street from some black neighbors may not think they should be enslaved or killed off, but does wish they would live somewhere else. He might interpret the phrase in that context. Then his daughter might start dating their son, and now he starts ranting at dinner.

      He votes for Trump, but Trump is being pushed other people who very much do want to enslave or kill black people.

      Even at its height, fascism never had a majority. It barely cobbled together a reasonable sized plurality. If it were just people who supported their policies as stated with few reservations, they wouldn’t even have that. Slippery statements like these are there to attract the adjacent right wingers to support actions they never would otherwise.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        A suburban dad who lives across the street from some black neighbors may not think they should be enslaved or killed off, but does wish they would live somewhere else. He might interpret the phrase in that context.

        That’s still fascism, man. Ethnic cleansing is core to fascism.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Trump’s mother and two of his three wives (who birthed four children) are immigrants

        • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is why Critical Race Theory needs to be taught in schools. Think of how far from fascism we would be if we all learned in primary school how “white” excluded the Irish, Italian, Jewish, etc. until it was useful to include them against people of color.

          • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            CRT gets pretty dense from what I’ve seen of it. I definitely think dismantling the concept of race itself and teaching the humanities more seriously are definitely must-haves - I just think that CRT in primary school might a bit early. In the US at least.

            Edited to provide alittle more clarity.

        • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Nazi race theory changed multiple times throughout the war depending on which way the wind was blowing. It’s a feature, not a bug.

          Right now white supremacy is a somewhat disparate ideology, so they can’t be too picky about who is and isn’t white. That comes after they seize power and make headway in driving out or killing off the targeted opposition.

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Might as well be the 14 words. Either way it means the same thing, if you call yourself a GOP Republican you are an enemy of the constitution and a traitor to its values. You may not believe that but the GOP leaders clearly do and if there are 9 people and a vocal white supremacist Nazi are a table you have 10 Nazis at a table

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problems didn’t start with and will not end with trump. The republican party has been terrible for a long time now. Democrats insist that there are still decent republicans and that we can still work with them, but this is a fantasy akin to claiming there are good nazis and that they can be worked with in any reasonable capacity.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    During the rise of nazis in Germany, there were quite a few Americans who sympathized with the nazis, and there was even an American nazi party at one point.

    WW2 just told them they needed to be quiet and stealthy. They didn’t really go anywhere, and their influence over the GOP has only grown.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t buy into any of that racist and nationalistic garbage, but isn’t he then saying his own kids are less because of who he, Trump, chose as their mothers?

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, because the addendum implicit in the dog whistle is that it’s only NONWHITE immigrants who are “poisoning the blood”.

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t forget the second addendum: once they take care of the non-white problem, they’ll start making the definition of “white” more and more strict to keep the hate machine running.

        Looking at you Catholics, Italians, Irish, Polish, and anyone else who isn’t a white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant.

        • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Those divisions already exist. Back in 2007 I met a guy who belonged to some Christian sect and he didn’t consider Catholics to be Christian, which blew my mind since Catholics were there first. Even back in the 60s Kennedy broke the mold of those who said the US would never have a Catholic president.

          • djsoren19@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Because they existed a long, long time ago. As the straight white conservative male hegemony has lost power, the number of people they’re allowed to hate has shifted accordingly. Now they’re okay with any kind of Catholicism, any shade of white, and you can be a woman as long as you’re okay with being sexually assaulted. If they ever managed to regain their stronghold majority in politics, there’s no doubt in my mind they’d start turning on themselves as the old divisions started to come through.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah but that’s thinking too far ahead for Republican voters. The leopards would never eat their face.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honestly, out of the poll the thing that surprises me the most is that 71% of all participants think Trump will beat Biden if he’s nominated. That’s a huge margin.

    • Jordan117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      Note that this question (#13) was only asking “likely Republican primary voters.”

      To me, the most disturbing stat was #19, the 50-50 split among all likely voters between valuing “a strong economy” versus “a functioning democracy.”

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Funny how they think Trump has the best chance and the Haley has the worst chance, when the survey itself shows that the opposite is true.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Turns out beating the “BIDEN WEAK BIDEN WEAK” drum has had results. Our corporate masters must be so pleased.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    As an immigrant to the US, I gotta say, I don’t find this rhetoric very appealing. Quite repulsive, actually.

  • Bone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    All they have are threats and put downs because they lack ideas. Not that that matters, because they are a significant, dangerous lot that festers.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    As Donald Trump dominates the GOP nomination race and some of his inflammatory comments find favor with the party faithful, CBS News measured how the public feels about his “poisoning the blood” language.

    Since we randomly assigned respondents to see one version of the question or the other, we can examine whether attribution to Trump changes agreement.

    As the above chart illustrates, Republican voters become 10 percentage points more likely to agree with the statement when they are explicitly told it came from Trump.

    MAGA and Trump voters are also likelier than other Republicans to agree at baseline — without any attribution.

    The takeaway is that the right wing of the party is inclined to agree to begin with, and that Trump making such statements likely increases their acceptance.

    This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,870 U.S. adult residents interviewed between January 10-12, 2024, including 786 likely Republican primary voters.


    The original article contains 335 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 53%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!