• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A significant portion of this blog post is complaining about Mozilla’s repeated attempts to find new revenue streams that aren’t Firefox. It’s a sentiment I see a lot and I just don’t get it.

    They complain about Google paying to be the default search provider being a bad thing, and yet when Mozilla says “yeah, we hear ya, that’s why we’re trying to find stuff to diversify into so we can become less reliant on Google” people cry and shout “you should be sticking to Firefox, why aren’t you focussing on Firefox??”

    Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox and commit to reliance on Google? Because maintaining a project as big as Firefox without any funding simply isn’t possible, and people aren’t going back to paying for web browsers.

    What these people want is not at all realistic. Devs want to be paid for their work. They can’t have that if Mozilla follows idiots like Lunduke’s “don’t take money from Google, but also don’t do anything that will make money. Only do Firefox.”

    I’ve yet to see a single one of these people offer any alternative that comes even remotely close to being feasible.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m okay with Mozilla trying to diversify their source of incomes, as long as it’s focused on privacy. Firefox Relay is a great example of a paid service that helps preserving some privacy and I gladly pay for it.

      I hope they’ll make more privacy-focused optional services like that. If it helps paying for Firefox continued development while detaching from Google then it’s a good idea.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’ve got some pretty interesting stuff in the pipeline, like container tabs optionally being hooked up to their own independent Mozilla VPN connection.

        IMO I think they’re going to go all in eventually offering a kind of “privacy ecosystem” similar to Proton

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The privacy of… checks notes

        Category of Personal Information Collected Third Parties to Whom Personal Information is Sold/Shared
        browsing history Advertising partners, Service providers
        search history Advertising partners, Service providers
        your device’s precise location Advertising partners, Service providers
        a profile about a consumer Advertising partners, Service providers
        records of personal property, products or services purchased Advertising partners, Service providers

        Source: Mozilla

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      Good comment. I like the fact that Mozilla is branching out into Relay and VPN as subscription services. I’ve got to pay someone for VPN, after all, and email masking looks interesting. If the revenue from those kinds of useful subscriptions helps to sustain Firefox and it’s derivatives, so much the better.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox

      Presumably these are different people.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Devs want to be paid for their work.

      WTF does that have to do with bloating salaries for CEOs while devs get laid off? They’re doing their damnedest to put less budget towards paying devs (for Firefox or otherwise, by the way), not more!

      Mozilla’s CEO is failing no matter how you look at it, including even through your own rose-colored glasses.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Of course they spend it on more than just Firefox. What part of “we’re trying to diversify” don’t you understand?

        And I’m sorry, Lunduke is not a trustable source. He went seriously off the deep end years ago.

        From a great Linux content creator to a crazed Qanon, COVID conspiracy anti-vaxx nut trying to pedal all kinds of nonsense, who loves to shit on LGBT Linux devs. I really don’t know what the hell happened to him.

        • gens@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It is hard to draw conclusions without knowing much facts. How much is needed and how much is got.

          And i don’t care about wings.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It depends what “diversify” hides.

      Do you mean:

      • Work on ethical projects that don’t scrape user data
      • Stay away from trendy buzzwords like VR and AI

      Or do you mean

      • Buy a data-harvesting company along with all the private data it harvested
      • Inject the data-harvesting company’s code into your browser, along with some extra ads
      • Create a website content generator that’ll create soulless slop for SEO spammers?

      Because right now, Mozilla has chosen the second route. The anti-privacy, anti-ethical route.

      If Mozilla reaches the logical end state, will it even matter if they still exist? They’ll be soulless corporate trash too. There won’t be anything worth preserving.

  • hoot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    How do rambling blog articles full of terrible assumptions and analysis like this get posted? Is there an alternative technology community I could sub to that cares about quality content?

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Amen. It would be nice to have posts on actual technology instead of business/financial news about technology companies, or what shitty CEOs are doing in their personal lives.

    • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is why I block users who share garbage after the first few times I notice it. For example, this will be the last post I see from OP.

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Firefox Marketshare nosedives

    That can’t be true, literally everyone on the Fediverse uses Firefox.

  • psychothumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is the real problem with these Silicon Valley fads like crypto and AI - they cause idiot tech executives to disinvest in their worthwhile products in an attempt to get on the bandwagon.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’d like to have the same kind of bonuses when I don’t meet my KPIs

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ll never understand how someone can get paid like that. If Mozilla was destroying the opposition, I’d get it though.

  • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Okay, so, good news for the CEO, but terrible news for the Internet as a whole. Awesome.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Brian Lunduke is one of the sketchiest, chuddiest, bottom-feeding troglodytes in the technology “news” sphere. I doubt he wants Mozilla to do anything but crash and burn.

    But he’s also right, and the fact he’s stuck his ugly pixelated avatar on top of publicly available Mozilla records does not make them any less correct.