• JoBo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t buy it. They know they will lose the next election, the only question is how much damage they can do before they’re kicked out. He just wants to introduce his upper middle-class tax cuts/subsidies as soon as possible so that they can steal as much as possible from the rest of us.

    They’ll hang on for another ~year yet, sad to say.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The tory Party isn’t the pm, it’s likely what they want - which is useful power - doesn’t fit into this thinking.

      What’s better, an extra few months of nothing particularly useful that can be reversed as soon as they lose government or focusing on GE 2029.

      The fact is that the next few years in Britain is going to be absolutely dire, and being able to point at Labour through that is probably the next messaging. The sooner they can get Labour to try (and likely fail) to deal with the mess they created, the better their GE 2029 prospects are

      They also likely want to retain as many seats as they have now, they aren’t going to retain more by waiting.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Labour won’t reverse any of the damage they can do now, so they’ll do as much as they possibly can. They’re in it for the power, and the wealth they can extract. The Tory MO, of course, but especially this generation of Tories. They have no politics bar the advancement of themselves and the people who will end up giving them overpaid jobs. Sunak doesn’t need to work for a living but the pay off for him and his ilk is orders of magnitude greater than what we pay him to do the job.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          His ilk, want jobs in five years, they want the power in five years. They want to ensure that more than they want six months more power this year.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, and also Labour lose nothing from saying it will be in May because it builds expectations and the Tories are the ones who have to explain why they don’t want an election yet…

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly this. They’re trying to engineer a 2007-style ‘election that never was’ to make Sunak look weak. And he is weak, so good luck to them!

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It depends on whether they think they can _somehow_squeak a win, and when that might be.

      If their number crunchers have said their best chance is in May, and that with the right tailwind they might be able to form a coalition government, then we can expect them to go full “sweets for everyone”, and offer every incentive in the box.

      The other side of this, is that they need Brexit Party (sorry, Reform UK) either out of the way, or need enough policies that will appease those voters. So I’m expecting some lunacy on the level of “stop the boats”. Or maybe they’ll just invade France.

    • Juujian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sunak got his and his job sucks. Losing an election sounds like an easy way out for his cabinet.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Emily Thornberry told Sky News that the date of the spring budget “seems to confirm” what many MPs suspect - that the prime minister could go to the polls early.

    The next general election is expected in 2024, but until recently it was widely believed it would be held in the autumn to give the prime minister as much time as possible to convince voters the economy is improving and better days are ahead.

    However, after Jeremy Hunt announced the government would hold an earlier than anticipated budget, with a date set for 6 March, it fuelled growing speculation that the election could be in the spring instead.

    The budget date was confirmed after reports the Conservatives could slash inheritance tax (IHT) and offer more help for first-time buyers as a pre-election giveaway to boost their chances of victory and create policy dividing lines with Labour.

    Ms Thornberry would not be drawn on whether her party would back the measures the Tories are said to be mulling over, saying those briefings are designed to “set a trap for Labour”.

    Some pollsters believe Mr Sunak will want as much time as possible to turn around his party’s 20-point deficit in the polls and deliver on his five key pledges, including growing the economy and stopping the boats.


    The original article contains 623 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Noit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This prediction market has May at 50%, and that’s mainly because I keep buying it off he back of news like this. Seems like a lot of people are May doubters.

    Reasons I think May is the most likely candidate are:

    • expected polling bounce off a giveaway budget in March
    • small boat numbers are at their natural minimum and only rise as Summer begin
    • later in the year you start running into things like party conference, which you don’t want to miss, and fuel bills, which are going to be a bad news story again. Even if you rank “holding on to power above all else” as the most important thing, a late Q4 election looks a terrible mistake.