GM’s CarPlay replacement software is off to a disastrous start - 9to5Mac::I don’t need to remind you that GM is ditching CarPlay starting with its 2024 model year EVs. We’ve covered…

  • Starbuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think it’s worth saying that the head unit failing in this scenario is very disruptive for two reasons:

    First and foremost, the purpose of this journey in this car is to review the car. So if the head unit craps out, and he doesn’t make every effort to reboot it, and he mentions it in the review, he loses a lot of credibility from the users and industry folks. Could you imagine a review for a computer where it crashes or turns off, and the reviewer just says “welp, that’s all folks”?

    My second point is that he is navigating in an unfamiliar place to a charger for the car. If you’re coming from Tesla or AA/CarPlay, this is something you expect to work flawlessly. And it’s part of the review that’s worth discussing whether or not it works.

    In my opinion, even if he 100% knew where he was going, his behaviors are justified for a review.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I won’t touch this with a 10 foot pole. Stupid.

    If they really wanted to make a play at beating CarPlay and Android Auto, they should make a superior product, but include both of the alternatives in the car. As a customer, I would still consider buying the car if it included CarPlay. I won’t even consider it with this, which means I won’t even be in a position to try GM’s alternative. It’s too big of a risk to spend $30-40k on a new car and hope their custom infotainment isn’t trash and works nicely with all the data and apps I have in my smartphone.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can’t say I was inclined to buy a GM before but now I’m absolutely not going to buy one. The problems described in these reviews are safety issues.

  • RandomPancake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can honestly say that the phrase “my radio was stuck in a boot loop” is something I ever thought I’d need to say, but here we are.

    Side note, you know what would be just absolutely perfect? Just Bluetooth. I don’t need to watch Disney+ while I drive. I don’t need up-to-the-minute notifications of the hottest celebrity news. I don’t need sports updates. I don’t need to know what my stocks are doing right now.

    I just want to play music.

    • raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Eh, it’s nice to be able to reliably control my music from the screen with Android Auto.

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can change songs from my steering wheel and I own a 2008 Volkswagen Gol which is the third world country version of the golf 2 more or less

        You can keep your shitty touch screen I’d rather just have the physical buttons and Bluetooth

        Ive never had any issues with it (other than the microphone not working anymore but the stereo itself is a refurb)

        • raptir@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure you can change songs, but with Android Auto I can have it play a different album or playlist with voice commands. I can fast forward through ads in a podcast either by tapping the skip button or talking to it.

          Honestly the bigger thing for me is the superior GPS without a separate unit though.

          • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Honestly I just got a phone holder and use my phone independently of the car for all that. And voice commands never quite worked right in my experoence, but Spanish is the regional language where I live so maybe that has something to do with it.

            I do see the appeal of having the screen integrated (when it’s actually integrated and not just a tablet hanging off the dash like someone Jerry rigged it there) but I feel rather heavily that at no point you should use a tactile interface in a car and that all and any functions that you can use in your car while moving should have physical buttons so you can use them without thinking

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    I struggle to imagine spending twenty minutes on the side of the road troubleshooting my car’s touchscreen, rather than just driving and dealing with it later. Maybe a quick reset, sure, but not more than that.

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Who could have imagined that this might happen?

    I mean, yeah there’ve been dozens of articles from unbiased analysts suggesting that GM was not in a position to take on this task, especially since Apple CarPlay and Google Android Play have already accomplished what’s necessary and are available to nearly 100% of GM’s customers, but a company the size and scope of GM couldn’t possibly be expected to listen to any of this analysis over these many months.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Almost all first party OS’s from Car manufacturers are complete garbage, idk why anyone has any faith that a car manufacturer (And ancient “old guard” types at that) is going to have good code and good UI/UX

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I expect nothing less. And even if they do make the software stable and usable it will be quickly ruined by micro transactions and subscriptions for basic functionality.

    Trash software from a trash company.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    The deep sleep by walking away is infuriating.

    Give me an option to reboot entirely from the settings menu

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      But that will be… gasp …boring.

      Jokes aside carplay in my car usually just plays podcasts, and sometimes displays navigation, though for the most part it is not needed as I learn the streets.

      • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I use navigation all the time, or have it up at least, for the live traffic updates. Very useful!

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh yeah, especially just to get a birds eye of an unfamiliar area.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Yeah. GM doesn’t care about how good it is. Making it good is expensive. They can keep it crappy because you don’t really have any choice (other than buying from another manufacturer that will do the same). Plus they make money selling your data.

  • Dizzirron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    One day We are have to come together, and find faith to figure out how to operate a car without entertainment systems and screens.

  • lukewarmtuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I know this is probably off topic but I’m always stunned in these articles how simple things like this cause peoples (the authors) brains to just meltdown. They seemingly become so helpless when they don’t have a screen to tell them what to do and where to go. As a species we have been so heavily spoiled that simple inconveniences are seemingly incomprehensible to people who are surrounded and coddled by technology at every moment.

    That’s not to say I’m perfect and haven’t fallen victim to these things myself, but I at least try to make do and overcome without complaining to the world how hard it is, since it’s not hard at all, just a bit inconvenient. At least I’m not making sandals out of discarded tires, shit could be worse than my car not being able to tell me where to go for a few minutes. (Not trying to say people in those conditions live shitty lives, they’re just subject to their environments; they very well may enjoy their way of living but from my western, coddled perspective, it sounds subjectively unpleasant and I’m greatful for what I have) /rant

    More on topic, it’s really sad and unfortunate that so many software based products are shipping in such abysmal and borderline useless states until months after release. Too many things are made now with the presumption that “we just gotta ship it and we’ll fix it later”. It’s annoying as hell but understandable with games, it’s not a critical piece of software. A car though? Even if it’s the infotainment system it’s still awful. I love my '06 car, works great, gets me where I need to go, doesn’t harvest my data or relies on a battery to open the door.

    I’m reminded of an article from 2015 about how a Jeep could be “hacked” while in motion and the attacker could apply the e-brake or kill the engine. Scary stuff, and with a thousands of pound rolling machine, it better not have such flawed software.

    Anyway, I wish we could go back to an engine on wheels and a protective shell, don’t need all the “gizmos” so to speak.