• Andonno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really.

        1/3 = 0.3•

        1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 0.3• + 0.3• + 0.3•

        3/3 = 0.9•

        1 = 0.9•

        And that’s only one proof, there are others.

        • TechieDamien@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is not a proof as you start with the answer, albeit disguised as a known truth. Here is a real proof. Start by assigning the recurring decimal a variable.

          x = 0.9999...
          

          Now calculate 10 times this by shifting the decimal place.

          10x = 9.9999...
          

          You can then subtract the second equation from the first. Note that all the digits after the decimal cancel out, leaving us with the following.

          9x = 9
          x = 1
          

          Therefore, 0.9999… = 1. Infinity does weird things!

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          can 0.3• + 0.3• + 0.3• be really be added to equal 0.9• the same way that 0.3 + 0.3 + 0.3 = 0.9 though? and if so, is it proven or assumed? im not saying ur wrong btw, just asking. and does 0.000…001 equal 0?

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            0.3• has infinte decimals, 0.0000…001 does not. No matter how many zeroes you put before the one, there will never be infinite zeroes, so it’s not equal to 0.

            You simply cannot have “Infinity + 1” decimals, since infinity + 1 = infinity.

          • TechieDamien@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is actually a smallest number, typically denoted by a lower case epsilon, which is infintesimally small, typically used in calculus proofs.

        • Tedesche@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a math person at all, so I’m not really debating your proof, but it seems to me that if 0.9• = 1, then what does 0.1• equal? It “fits” perfectly into the “space” between 0.9• and 1, but if 0.9•=1 then 0.1• should equal 0, right? Except it doesn’t, because 0.1<0.1• and 0.1 definitely isn’t 0.

          I definitely understand why some religious people think numbers are a tool of Satan.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    or place any kind of a complex math equation to the power of zero … equals 1 … and also … WHAT DID YOU DO WITH THAT THUMB!?

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn I really uses to enjoy being told stuff like this as a kid. Even math gave me a sense of wonder when framed this way.

  • NarendraCzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i do multiply with pen and paper and then realize i f*ked up when i don’t know how to multiply with zero. Ah! Those days