• Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of a bit that George Carlin did regarding climate change: “The planet’s gonna be fine. The people are FUCKED!

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds conservative to me. I feel like to cap it to a billion we’d need massive agriculture overhaul and renewable energy investment, and neither of those are valued in profit or political capital.

  • demonquark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are the most likely causes of death? Are we talking average life expectancy drops by a couple of years, but quality of life remains constant? Or are we talking famine and war due to a loss of areable land?

    I assume it’s a little of both, but it’s useful to know which sides the scales tip.

    • OnionQuest@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an estimate of premature deaths based on CO2 emissions.

      "Pearce and Parncutt found the peer-reviewed literature on the human mortality costs of carbon emissions converged on the “1,000-ton rule,” which is an estimate that one future premature death is caused every time approximately 1,000 tons of fossil carbon are burned.

      “Energy numbers like megawatts mean something to energy engineers like me, but not to most people. Similarly, when climate scientists talk about parts per million of carbon dioxide, that doesn’t mean anything to most people. A few degrees of average temperature rise are not intuitive either. Body count, however, is something we all understand,” said Pearce, a Western Engineering and Ivey Business School professor.

      “If you take the scientific consensus of the 1,000-ton rule seriously, and run the numbers, anthropogenic global warming equates to a billion premature dead bodies over the next century. Obviously, we have to act. And we have to act fast.”"

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That sounds low enough to ensure a dystopian future. It could be much higher and still get there easily.

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This doesn’t account for the fear of rich humans as the poorer humans aggressively seek relief and/or completely justified revenge.