• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate to be a pessimist but if people hate Musk as much as they seem to, but can’t leave twitter,

    or post “Fuck Spez” thousands of times, but won’t leave reddit,

    I’m cautious about how much of an exodous I expect to see from chrome.

    I think its time we face the fact that most people will trade almost anything for convenience.

    • Kerrigor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The piece that gets continuously underestimated is who moves in these small initial jumps. It tends to be the more technically inclined, who over the next couple years, their recommendations will lead to friends and family moving as well, at a slower rate.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The piece that gets continuously underestimated is who moves in these small initial jumps. It tends to be the more technically inclined, who over the next couple years, their recommendations will lead to friends and family moving as well, at a slower rate.

        Sure. And here we are. I’m sure these companies consider us a real fly in the ointment. But I’m not inclined to believe the past is perfectly predictive of the future. What you described is also, in my perspective, how things have gone in the past. But will it happen the same way this time? I don’t know. I’m not confident based on what I’ve seen. They are trying to close in the walls on the internet and they are confident that people are too lazy to stop them.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Internet Explorer managed to fall from 96% market share to complete irrelevance, Chrome is not immortal either.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You arent wrong. But, acectdata and mine own, convenience drove that. People are fucking lazy and hate nothing more than to be inconvenienced. When chrome was getting traction, explorer was trasshhhhhhhhh and every one knew it.

        Chrome might be a bit bloated but its no explorer. If it doesn’t hurt people to stay, I don’t think we’ll see a shift.

      • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Back then internet users werent normies, but nreds and tech savy people. Also, chrome learned from IE’s mistakes. It wont stop functioning and will keep updating, so the average normy user wont mind.

          • Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I genuinely don’t know how Ill use the web without ad block. Cause I damn sure ain’t going back to paying for anti-virus like in the 90’s for a web experience that is objectively worse and less magical enough to risk it.

            Drive by malware and viruses from ads has gotten scarily good at infecting systems without you knowing. It’s worse than ever as it’s not just a sketchy site issue thing anymore either. Even reputable sites have ads that only take one misclick to infect you now

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Times have changed. The userbase that dropped IE was a vastly different one. With the internet being more accessible and more alluring to the massed (i.e. because of social media) convenience is king.

    • manucode@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Browsers at least, unlike social networks, don’t benefit from networking effects. How many people use a specific browser doesn’t directly affect the usefulness of that browser, as users of different browsers can interact with each other to the same degree as users of the same browser. For now at least, as Google’s Web Integrity API could obviously change that if websites start to require and some browser are unable or unwilling to provide it.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        How many people use a specific browser doesn’t directly affect the usefulness of that browser, as users of different browsers can interact with each other to the same degree as users of the same browser. For now at least, as Google’s Web Integrity API could obviously change that if websites start to require and some browser are unable or unwilling to provide it.

        Thats a great point and something to consider.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. I MUST use Edge at work and honestly, its fine. Its not some radical departure from Firefox, i dont have to think too hard about the differences.

    • umulu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched to Firefox on windows and android on the same day as I saw that WEI bullshit.

      I don’t know why the fuck I was thinking it would be a worse experience… It’s the same thing.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a slow process, most will still use it, but it will be less and less as time passes.

      Twitter is a different beast, most of the people you follow on twitter are only active in certain groups.

      All we can do is inform them and focus on what we do, no need to be stuck on what others do.

  • Hobbes@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just switched yesterday after learning more about why I should here in Lemmy.

    The last time I tried FF (many years ago) it was incredibly slow, so I went with chrome. But the FF of today is actually noticably quicker.

    • maaj@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah being able to import all my stuff from chrome to Firefox was so clutch, now I just have to find a good day to spend getting the rest of my shit out of google’s hands and get this pixel phone to run grapheneOS.

      • figaro@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privacy and not being part of Google would be the biggest reason.

        It also looks kinda nice, in my opinion.

        It’s also faster than chrome now I think.

        • godless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also faster than chrome now I think.

          Resource management is much better. Chrome will max out the RAM, which slows down the browser. Firefox handles that 100x better.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Apart from privacy concerns, Google has started to add some really bad features to Chrome, such as “Manifest V3” and “Web Environment Integrity”. These limit your ability to block ads or generally modify the websites you’re visiting, and are just a bad for the web as a whole. WEI is basically DRM for the web, so Google checks your device and denies you access to websites if they don’t like it. But as long as the majority of people keep using Chrome they can just force these things onto everyone.

    • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My friggin’ Chromebook (which works great) can’t install FF.

      I’ve tried rooting into Ubuntu, but, I can’t get it all straightened out. Until I notice truly diminished issues… I’ll use Chromebook as is.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not even as an Android app? I’ve run Firefox from crostini as well but the Android approach is a lot easier.

    • Hangglide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried FF earlier this year. It sucked. Everything just took extra clicks. The password manager was a pain and didn’t interact with my phone apps properly.

      I know the complaints against chrome. When it starts forcing me to watch ads I might try FF again.

      • pipes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, at least installing a foss browser won’t slow down your phone like a spyware app, you could always try something like Mull even for only a portion of your browsing if you have ~80MB to spare. I suggest it because I hate some of that extra bullshit that comes with standard Firefox. Also there’s tons of projects that try similar stuff with Chromium! Like Mulch. Way better defaults than Chrome

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Android FF is not a great user experience for sure. On desktop it’s just fine but Android is janky. I tolerate anyway to support Firefox but chrome is miles better on mobile.

    • Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk, I’ve used both browsers and I prefer Chrome in terms of features and UI. But it’s not worth the privacy you get with Firefox

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        in terms of features

        Like what? I can understand UI because that’s a personal preference but there’s nothing that Chrome does that Firefox doesn’t. Hell, allowing you to download app extensions on mobile browsers is a game changer. No ads and background play on YT has changed my life

        • drekly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use Firefox now and have most of this year.

          One thing that annoyed me was how much more awkward it is to switch between two user profiles .

          In chrome I have a work email a personal email, each with its own account, and a different look. I can immediately tell which I’m using, and can switch between them with the button at the top right.

          I managed to mess around and find an extension which kind of does the same thing, so I’m no longer missing the feature, but it’s definitely jankier and doesn’t work as smoothly.

          Also, I don’t know if it’s a bitwarden issue, but autofill hardly ever works properly.

          Sometimes I want to pull a tab into its own window on the other screen. You’re not allowed to do this when the browser is full screen, only when it’s windowed. Annoying.

          These are my only issues with firefox I can think of.

        • Tiranunossauro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I personally really miss being able to group tabs. I don’t think you’re able to do it on Firefox, right?

          Firefox has extensions that can help with this, but I find the way Chrome does it extremely useful. I’d still choose Firefox, but there are certainly a couple of features that Chrome has that can be helpful

        • Hangglide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I put in a good faith effort to switch to FF earlier this year. I really wanted to like it. I consider myself an expert user to so it wasn’t just “I didn’t know what I was doing.” I recently switched back to Chrome. I hope FF gets better because I don’t like recent Chrome news.

    • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      same problem we had back in the ie5/6 days: it was just there and most people don’t care. i physically cringe when i watch co-workers using chrome with not even a basic adblocker installed, klicking away ads, promts, pop-ups, videos and whatnot just to access a news article. it’s horrible!

        • tool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m forced to use either Chrome or Edge for my work computer and it drives me crazy.

          I’ve been a Sysadmin for a ~decade. I can state with 100% certainty that the reason behind that decision is that you can very easily configure Group Policy to control the behavior and visibility/availability of features in Chrome and Edge. Firefox didn’t have that until just a couple of years ago, and it wasn’t great when it first became available. And to be honest, it’s still not fully baked, but it’s at least usable now from an administrative perspective.

          Maybe bring it up to your IT department and include this link in the email/ticket.

    • Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’ve been using Firefox exclusively for ages. And also Duckduckgo, I just can’t stand the excessive of Google’s captcha since I always use VPN.

    • ObservantOcelot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d use it exclusively, but there’s no Ad Blocker for it on iOS, and I don’t want to run an ad blocking VPN all the time. I also don’t like how there’s no official PWA support on desktop.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chrome doesn’t support extensions at all on iOS, only Safari does - because of Apple. Firefox would absolutely support extensions and use Gecko on Ios if Apple let them.

      • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there is strict tracking protection which acts like a slightly degraded ad blocker. It has blocked everything except YouTube ads and “you have ad blocker enabled” pop ups for me.

  • DireDazzle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Showing people that they can avoid ads by switching from chromium might make more people use adblockers.

    I get flabbergasted whenever I talk to someone and realize they’re unaware that such things exist. I hope all (according to the google store entry for ublock origin) 10,000,000 of the ublock origin users switches from chromium based browsers to, say, firefox…

    Feels like chromium is the new internet explorer…

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why Google is trying to launch the “Web Integrity API” that will essentially allow them to mandate any website accessible to or using Google Services to ban browsers that have ad blockers.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me it looks like a tech savy kind of hurdle, once people learn about it and start thinkering they start to use it also.

      Better for us when people start caring for what they tolerate from corps.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You wish that was happening.

    I’m preparing to be completely unsurprised that Firefox’s market share will still be at 3% next month and the month after that.

    • Deebster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I alway wonder how underreported the Firefox figures are by things like that its users are generally more technical/privacy aware (so are blocking the trackers that report these numbers) and also spiders and bots often pretend to to Chrome (inflating those numbers).

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I had to choose between a tracked, ad-filled experience and a slower, protected experience, I would go back to 1990s style Internet in a second.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slower? I think browsers are all pretty much on par these days.

      The killer feature Firefox needs to implement is profile switching.

      • Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You may know this, but firefox does support multiple profiles. I regularly open it with firefox -p "PROFILENAME" depending on whether I’m working or not. you can go to about:profiles to manage the different profiles.

        • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find Containers to be very clunky to use. I love the idea, but not being able to just send a tab, cookies, session and everything to a Container is a PITA.

          • arglebargle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How would that work though? If you start outside a container how can you decide what to isolate to put into one?

  • ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A few years back when Firefox went through the whole “Quantum” update, I jumped and never looked back. It’s just better in every way, in my opinion.

  • gi1242@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think firefox should ship with ublock origin installed. (Perhaps also containers).

    Hopefully then more people will migrate faster

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the advantage for google of doing this move? People “savy” enough to install an adblock (or even know that it exists) is most likely to switch to a competitor that allows for adblocking

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Majority will keep using, for a while, until years later more see what has happened and move.

      Mean while profits on marketing go up.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mhm, I see that point, although I find it concerning given that the quality of the UX platforms like youtube has kept a consistent decline over the past decade. It feels like google keeps amassing more and more reasons for people to enable adblockers but I also understand youtube needs to be a profitable business and at some point you need to show ads

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, these are the challenges of freeware, ads are required unless you pay or become a pirate.

          Youtubers/social media now mostly have promotions within videos, so we went back to how cable functions.

          Thoughts on Social media/Rumble/twitter and other video platforms will evolve over time?

          I think Alphabet (Google) will keep doing things that make people leave there other platforms, youtube will take a while so changes will be more gradual.

          • egeres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a small note, in an unexpected turn of events, that “sponsor block” extension popped up also blocking promotions, I find it incredibly amazing that blocking ads can even go that further

            I can’t put my finger on it, but somehow I feel like youtube is irreplaceable, I don’t say this out of some internet patriotism, I just think the initial momentum of inertia really has to be massive to make it budge, while with fediverse-stuff you can gradually generate content and maybe some people will be attracted (?)

            And twitter’s trajectory is to fucking weird and unpredictable right now that I just have no clue 🙃🙃🙃

            • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Awesome, I did not know blocking sponsers was a thing, wow.

              Yes, you are right, youtube will be harder to leave for people, but Tiktok/twitter/etc. are grabbing the attention away from yt.

              They all are trying to keep you on their platform as much as possible, for ads and data collection.

              The new big thing may be bettet at that…?

              Thanks for your input!

              • egeres@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh yes, you’re right, tiktok is really eating youtube’s meal… and about the new big thing, hums, I’m not sure how it would look like 🤔

                Thank you for your input as well!! 🙌🏻✨

                • jigsaw250@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  TikTok is definitely hitting for certain demographics, but YouTube is still king in the long form department and I don’t see that changing unless they completely alienate their watchers and creators or someone comes along and offers significantly more money (to creators).

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google has gone to absolute shit. Unless you let them stick their hand down your pants and fondle you, you can’t even use their search engine with out getting hit with a captcha so they can use browser fingerprinting to track you. We were all hearded into the slaughter house and they are just now starting up the kill machines.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s a two-pronged attack.

      They have the Trust API changes they are trying to push, which I believe they may try to make websites only support browsers using that API. They have a largest user base already so they have some sway, if Chrome won’t load your webpage, you business might be dead.

      Couple that with their anti ad blocking extension, users have to use Chrome to access webpages and can’t block ads on those pages.

      Mildly tinfoil-hatty, but I think within the realm of possibility.

  • desto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the old days I used Firefox exclusively, until my work started only supporting chrome so I kinda went with it and switched. Out of habit I continued until a couple of years ago, that I went full Firefox again and I remembered why I loved it.

  • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    people when they learn about unlock origin works better with firefox

    I bet most people saying chrome is faster don’t even know about adblockers or are using Google’s websites

    • Mellibird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I made the switch I was shocked at well it blocks ads. It still surprises me to this day. Yeah, it takes a little longer to load, but I couldn’t care less.

  • thebeardedgent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I started using Firefox as my browser at work because I hate trying to use profiles and I’m a convert! It’s really great!