• @pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        It simplifies things as part of communicating science (it’s quite literally “in a nutshell”), but pseudo intellectual is pushing it. From what I’ve seen, it’s quite well researched. I didn’t spot anything here that was obviously incorrect.

        • @electrodynamica@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          It is entertainment first, with facts thrown in. It’s clickbait in video form. It’s riddled with nonstop clickbaity rhetorical questions throughout.

          For comparison, see Sabine Hossenfelder’s Science Without the Gobbledygook for genuine simplified science communication.

          • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            It’s a shorter form with more entertaining graphics. Hossenfelder’s just fills a different niche, not an intrinsically better one. This doesn’t need to be a “stop liking things I don’t like” moment.